Public data
Which attraction claims hold up?
Search 15 source-graded claims and download the evidence ledger as CSV or JSON.
Fieldnote Press
An evidence-graded dating book for men
Duncan Reeve · Fieldnote Press · First published July 30, 2026 · ASIN B0HC87CCWV
The evidence-graded guide to attraction, dating, and knowing she means it
Most dating advice teaches you to decode body language, reply speed and profiles. Those clues cannot give you a reliable answer about one person. You Can’t Read Her checks familiar claims against more than 80 cited sources. Its method is straightforward: show honest interest, make a clear invitation and leave room for a real answer.
The book has 12 chapters, five evidence labels and a one-page Field Card. Research findings stay separate from the author’s inferences.
Published July 30, 2026 · ASIN B0HC87CCWV · Kindle edition
Two people are looking at her. Look again.
A dating guide you can recommend without an explanation.
The evidence, with the limits left in
7 of 25
Partners recognized 7 of 25 cases where someone later reported flirting in a lab study of 104 single heterosexual students. It measured agreement with a yes-or-no self-report, not attraction or sexual interest.
Hall, Xing & Brooks, 2015
100+ measures
Across two undergraduate speed-dating samples, more than 100 pre-date traits and preferences predicted broad tendencies. They did not reliably predict the pair-specific part of initial desire.
Joel, Eastwick & Finkel, 2017
5 papers
Five studies from one field-research corpus were retracted online on February 25, 2025. The book follows the retraction records and checks related claims against stronger evidence.
Retraction record included
The offer
Make one small offer
Offer something specific and easy to decline. The response gives you better information than another round of cue-reading.
The response
Match what comes back
If she engages and reciprocates, continue at the same scale. If interest is weak or absent, step back. Big jumps erase useful information.
The boundary
Keep the exit open
Any no ends it. Hesitation, withdrawal, ambiguity or a lack of reciprocity means slow down or stop. Consent remains continuous and revocable.
Chapter Three
Some dating advice outlived the evidence behind it. Chapter 3 follows retractions, stronger tests and shaky sources back to the original claims.
It ends with five questions you can apply to any research-backed promise. Read the source audit.
| The claim you were sold | Status |
|---|---|
| “Touch studies prove a compliance tactic” | Two related papers among five retracted |
| “Wear red” | Women rating men: d = 0.13; evidence of upward bias |
| “Time it to her cycle” | No facial or vocal masculinity shift in large hormone-assayed studies |
| “Dim lighting disinhibits” | Traced here to a 1973 magazine report |
Twelve chapters in four parts. The first three chapters are free.
Part One: The Lie
When Flirting Goes Unnoticed · Profiles Predicted Tendencies, Not the Pair · The Graveyard
Part Two: The Move
Elicit and Verify · The Engine · Brakes Before Gas · The Ladder Is a Loop
Part Three: The Levers
The One Body Thing · Delivery Beats Vocabulary · Stories, Not Résumés · Where, and How Often
Part Four: The Man
The Honest Man’s Unfair Advantage
This book is for you if
You have read signal lists and still feel unsure in real conversations. You want practical guidance that respects the other person and admits where the evidence is thin. You are willing to hear no.
Skip it if
You want pressure tactics, a guaranteed outcome or a loophole around a no. This book offers none of those. Read the free sample before deciding.
Start with your question
These guides give the useful answer first, name the studies and keep their limits attached. Each stands on its own.
Public data
Search 15 source-graded claims and download the evidence ledger as CSV or JSON.
Flirting or friendly?
What one flirting study measured, what the viral numbers leave out and how to get a clearer answer.
Cue lists
Eye contact, smiling and proximity can matter. None privately settles another person’s intention.
Hot and cold
One clear invitation, an open exit and a stopping point that does not require a diagnosis.
Source check
Five popular claims checked against measured outcomes, later evidence and the limits that matter.
New research
A 2026 study found modest predictive signal in speed-date transcripts. Here is what that does and does not establish.
Part One gives you the first three chapters in full plus the one-page Field Card. Download the 38-page PDF immediately, with no email required, and decide whether the full book is worth your money. A dated source note accompanies the current PDF.
No. The book rejects routines designed to create compliance. Its method begins with honest interest and an invitation that is easy to decline, then relies on the other person’s actual response.
No book can do that. This one explains why familiar cues are uncertain and gives you a clearer way to ask, listen and take the answer seriously.
A Kindle ebook with 12 chapters, four parts, five evidence labels, the Field Card and more than 80 cited sources. Amazon handles payment, delivery and retailer refunds.
Each graded claim is labelled Strong, Moderate, Emerging, Speculative or Dead. The source appears beside the grade, with full citations at the back.
Duncan Reeve is a pen name disclosed on the copyright page. He does not sell coaching, calls or a paid community. The book asks to be judged by its argument and cited sources.
Read the first three chapters free, or get the complete Kindle edition from Amazon.
Amazon processes payment, Kindle delivery and retailer refunds.